- Not a day goes by in the Philippines without reports about new friction and arms sales. Elevated military spending is now undermining economic development while fostering economic uncertainty and political volatility.
LAST week, Philippine and US Marines demonstrated “lethal firepower in two separate live fire exercises” that the Philippine Marine Corps portrayed as a “defense partnership.” It went hand in hand with high-profile, high-cost military deals.
These follow Manila’s flirting with the US Army Typhon missile systems. The deployment is part of the US military’s strategic repositioning in the Pacific and a moneymaker to the world’s largest weapons manufacturer, Lockheed Martin. In April, the US also approved the potential sale of 20 F-16 fighter jets to the Philippines in a $5.6 billion deal.
The Marcos Jr. government has also been busy negotiating a variety of military access deals not just with the US, but also with Japan and European powers.
To defense contractors, Manila is now a prime weapons theater in Southeast Asia.
Deals heralding the showdown
In parallel, the Marcos Jr. government, which is still licking its wounds after its weak performance in the recent midterm elections, signed a $700-million contract with Korea Aerospace Industries (KAI) to acquire an additional batch of 12 FA-50PH light combat aircraft.
Days before, the government inked a $460-million deal with French shipbuilder OCEA for 40 fast patrol boats for the Philippine Coast Guard. In mid-2020, on the eve of the proxy war in Ukraine, the French OCEA also signed a $186-million deal with Ukraine to provide 20 fast patrol boats. It’s great business for France, which is today the world’s second-largest arms exporter.
Manila had already purchased four similar FPB-72 gunboats in 2018, quickly renamed as Boracay-class patrol vessels. In the past few years, these have played a key role in the Philippines-China incidents in the South China Sea, thanks to Project Myoushu, a derivative of the US Naval Institute’s Maritime Counterinsurgency Project, and an initiative of a Stanford University think-tank.
Ever since President Ferdinand Marcos Jr. agreed to a number of new rotating military bases for the US in the Philippines, Manila has become a model of militarization in the region, as verified by military spending and arms transfers.
The ASEAN community features 10 nations. Today, only three of them are included in the Top 40 list of military spenders: Singapore, Indonesia, and the Philippines. Unlike the first two that have fallen in rank, the Philippines is on the rise and made the list for the first time in 2025. It is right behind Iraq.
The Philippines is investing increasingly in military spending. On a per capita basis, it spends more on arms than Indonesia, which has a population of over 280 million, as opposed to 115 million Filipinos.
Furthermore, the Philippines’ increase in military spending is on average twice as fast as Singapore’s and Indonesia’s. In the tiny city-state, the share of military spending of GDP is 2.8 percent; and in Indonesia, 0.8 percent. But in the Philippines, it is 1.3 percent — in relative terms, more than 50 percentage points higher than Indonesia.
In the Duterte era, the Philippines was an aspiring BRIC-like economy. Today, it is an assertive military spender that is cannibalizing its economic future.
PH as a major global arms importer
The Philippines is one of the world’s largest importers of arms. In a gross misallocation of resources, Manila is boosting its arms imports faster than any other major ASEAN arms importer.
In the global top 40 list of the world’s largest arms importers, there are just four ASEAN countries: Singapore, the Philippines, Indonesia, and Thailand. Although the tiny city-state has the largest share of global arms imports, the Philippines is second, ahead of both Indonesia and Thailand.

In the past half decade, these other ASEAN states have cut their arms imports by 20 percent (Singapore) to almost 50 percent (Indonesia, Thailand). They have tried to prepare for the economic headwinds that now drastically penalize global economic prospects. Unlike them, the Philippines has dramatically increased its share of global arms imports by more than 50 percentage points.
The ongoing militarization is dragging the Philippines into twisted alignments, which are undermining its foreign policy and diplomacy.
Atrocious alignments
Manila imports more than 80 percent of its arms from just three countries: South Korea (33 percent), Israel (27 percent) and the US (20 percent), which is also Ukraine’s main supplier (45 percent) and provides most arms imports to South Korea (86 percent) and Taiwan (98 percent).
The Philippines’ military suppliers are arms exporters cashing in on mass atrocities. Gaza is the prime example. After 1.5 years of abject obliteration, some Western countries are stopping arming Israel. By contrast, South Korea raked in $6 million in arms exports to Israel in eight months of 2024 alone.
Despite some chill in bilateral ties, Manila has been a big client of the Israeli military exports (over 8 percent of Israel’s total exports), including Spyder air defense systems from Rafael, Sabra 2 light tanks from Elbit Systems, Shaldag boats from Israel Shipyards, and Hermes-type drones. As Israel’s largest weapons manufacturer, Elbit produces killer drones for Gaza, while its MPR 500 multi-purpose bombs contain 26,000 controlled fragments for “high kill probability.”
In the Philippines, Shaldag patrol gunboats are known as Nestor Acero-class. Off the coast of Gaza, they ensure nobody can escape the living hell in Gaza, while keeping aid flotillas away.
The failing economic promise
In the Philippines, self-rated poverty exceeds 55 percent of the population, while 30 percent see themselves on the borderline of abject poverty. Militarization represents a massive misallocation of resources away from desperately needed social spending.
Not so long ago, the Marcos Jr. government boldly projected the country had the potential for 7 percent economic growth in annual terms. Thanks to costly militarization, misallocated spending, and the consequent political divides and volatility, the real growth rate in 2025 is likely to be slightly above 5.0 percent.
But when and if these weapons replace diplomacy in Southeast Asia, the worst is still ahead.
___________________________________________________________________________
Dr. Dan Steinbock is an internationally recognized strategist of the multipolar world and the founder of Difference Group. He has served at the India, China and America Institute (USA), Shanghai Institutes for International Studies (China) and the EU Center (Singapore). For more, see https://www.differencegroup.net
Author
- Ignoring preemptive evacuation a costly offense: councilor
- Blood samples from Barangay Inayangan confirm presence of virus: city vet
- EcoWaste Coalition alerts FDA on 14 unauthorized cosmetics, including 9 with high mercury content
- IMPULSES | More than grades
- 448 detainees in the city undergo rapid testing
- Lanao Sur identifies coffee, abaca as crops to develop
- BPI partners with Mapúa Malayan Colleges Mindanao to promote financial literacy in Davao
- P1.7-M worth of shabu seized at Toril checkpoint
- Exhibit set on Saturday
- LINE OF SIGHT | Reshaping Philippine tourism through VAT Refund Tourist Law